Tagged: bus263

Proximate cause: Palsgraf v. Long Island RR

In class we talked about proximate cause (or foreseeability) as a limitation to liability for negligence and strict liability. This doctrine comes from the case of Palsgraf v. Long Island Railroad. You could read the case (written by the illustrious Justice Benjamin N.Cardozo), or you could watch this Lego reconstruction:

BUS 263: “Ring of Fire” & tort law review

In class today, we discussed the case of Lisa, who was injured in the “Ring of Fire” contest at the Berlin (CT) Fair. Here’s a video we watched in class of the same contest at at different fair (where no one required hospitalization):

After watching the video consider whether the fair organizers might be liable in this case:

  • Could Lisa sue for an intentional tort?
  • Would the fair organizers have any defenses to an intentional tort claim?
  • Could Lise sue for negligence?
  • Would the fair organizers have any defenses to a negligence claim?
  • Could Lisa sue under a theory of strict liability?
  • Would the fair organizers have any defenses to a strict liability claim?

H/T Legal Studies Classroom

Even more study tips

BUS 263-01 Test 1 opportunity


If you were in class today, you know that there were some issues with the first test. Here’s the opportunity I’m offering:

  • To be turned in at the beginning of class on Thursday, March 22 (two weeks from today), write a study plan for what you will do differently to prepare for the next test.
  • There are only 2 wrong answers:
    • “Nothing” (it didn’t work this time; it won’t work next time, either)
    • “Study More” (either you didn’t study, or you’re just going to do more of what didn’t work last time)
  • If you do better on the next test, that grade will replace this one

Next week is spring break, so have a good break, and I’ll see you week after next.